Source – Hillary Clinton took a lot of flak on Monday after a report surfaced that the presidential candidate wore a Giorgio Armani jacket worth more than $12,000 during a speech in April about inequality.
Clinton, who was well-known for her vast pantsuit collection, has upgraded her wardrobe during her most recent bid for president to appear more relatable.
I don’t see what the big deal is really… I’m sure they were a gift, if you don’t believe her, check her emails. Oh wait..
Anyways, Hillary is getting eaten alive for this. How are you going to give a speech about inequality while wearing something that simply doesn’t equate to the common person? Doesn’t an advisor or someone on her staff of 700 people stop her and say “Hey maybe we should rethink this”.
You want to wear expensive suits because you can afford to? Go right ahead, you want to speak about equality while wearing some of the most expensive brands on the planet while speaking about inequality? Bad look Hill. Who exactly are you relating to? Most people in this world can hardly afford to put clothes on their children and still look presentable enough themselves to go to work.
That being said she looks gross and her dress choices are god awful. If you want to relate to pander to today’s audience, how about wearing something that doesn’t look like it came out of the 1940’s, start there. Don’t wear a jacket that costs more than peoples cars. Just a thought…
She literally looks like that old cranky lady that you just can’t stand and want to punch in the face but you don’t because you don’t want to go to jail for the rest of your life. She looks exactly like that. She has a very punchable face. Wearing these god awful jackets, I am only left to assume that you rolled out of bed and threw that on because your fat shirts were dirty.